Learning from monkey “talk”

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  17 Mar 2017:
Vol. 355, Issue 6330, pp. 1120-1122
DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7443

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
Publication Date - String

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: Monkey hear, monkey do, monkey ain’t got language
    • Marinus A.C. Huybregts, linguist, Utrecht University
    • Other Contributors:
      • Robert C. Berwick, computational linguist, MIT
      • Martin B.H. Everaert, linguist, Utrecht University
      • Johan J. Bolhuis, Cognitive Neurobiologist, Utrecht University

    Monkey hear, monkey do, monkey ain’t got language

    IN A PERSPECTIVES ARTICLE “Learning from monkey ‘talk’ ” (17 March, p. 1120), Charles Snowdon suggests that monkeys – macaques and baboons – have “vocal tracts capable of human-like speech,” and wonders “why non-human primates don’t talk.” But the presupposition that the ability to talk leads to full language is false.
    Human language is neither speech (because internal language can be spoken, signed, or haptic) nor communication (though externalized language can be used this way). Furthermore, speech and sign display similar developmental trajectories, subserved by the same neural substrate (1). It is a further mystery then why non-human primates did not simply develop sign from gesture. Human infants, in contrast, spontaneously develop sign language without linguistic input. Deaf-blind children (famously, Helen Keller) develop internal language in the absence of speech or sign. Speech and sign are thus simply input-output channels clearly not necessary, and obviously not sufficient for language. Rather what matters is language’s internal computational “operating system.”
    The basic property of this “operating system” generates an unbounded array of hierarchically structured expressions with systematic meanings, antedating speech or sign, virtually as a matter of logic (2-4). It relies only on structural properties, ignoring linear properties of the externalized signal (5, 6). Though the...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.